Few days ago we tried to do a Jisti meeting for a local non-profit association with Zied but we had to cancel because of very bad latency. ( 10 peoples)
We wonder if using self jitsi meet server will be better. All association members are in the same city.
Zied bootstraps docker-compose and dnp template in his github ( thank you): https://github.com/zguesmi/jitsi-meet-dnp
To go further, we must decide what to do regarding network of docker compose as Jitsi meet need several services (web, prosody,jvb etc …).
From my understanding, a specific network is created for dappnode core communication and for all dappnode packages that join a specific docker network. (code of merge and overwrite of docker-compose around here : https://github.com/dappnode/DNP_DAPPMANAGER/blob/9c52d86a074f67e95863392a4d5995064d5f753f/build/src/src/utils/dockerComposeParsers.ts#L288 )
So, we can’t create today a docker-compose with multiple services. Is that right ?
What is the best way to process currently :
only provide only 1 service in docker compose, using supervisord to launch all services in background in 1 dirty container ?
split into several DAppNode packages for each service and add dependencies between them ?
other solutions in long term or support of several services in one docker-compose?
There is also keys to generate only at install. We can create an entrypoint script to generate keys if not set. But is there a pre install feature for dappnode package that can be usefull here or for others packages too ?
There is also the https support question.
I think being able to deploy a Jisti meet server on DappNode can be cool to be able to join local collective provider after that. For instance this one :
You can then target and use services, serve by small local providers :
Being able to serve jisti calls for your associations or trusted people around you.
Bonus idea: use unlock Protocol membership or something like this, to restrain access to trust people or local associations jitsi usage. Share and revoke access at any time.
Or broadly speaking, share and revoke access on DNP level like ?
Bonus question : is there a fail2Ban feature in dappnode
We can discuss about this dnp idea at the next community call if you want.